11.05.2011, 23:41
There is only one timer, I guess it's efficient. The code just looks messy :P
More efficient way?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
More efficient way? - by ScottCFR - 11.05.2011, 22:33
Respuesta: More efficient way? - by admantis - 11.05.2011, 23:21
Re: More efficient way? - by ScottCFR - 11.05.2011, 23:41
Re: More efficient way? - by Steven82 - 11.05.2011, 23:58
Re: More efficient way? - by ScottCFR - 12.05.2011, 00:59
Re: More efficient way? - by (SF)Noobanatior - 12.05.2011, 05:12
Re: More efficient way? - by leong124 - 12.05.2011, 05:59
Re: More efficient way? - by Cameltoe - 12.05.2011, 07:28
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)