Posts: 404
Threads: 104
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation:
0
So whats better:
#1: Having one timer doing all the work you need.
#2: Having as much timers you need to do your work.
I was thinking of creating a 1 second timer, and save thicks in variables so i can delay things.
Thanks for the answers.
Posts: 1,466
Threads: 7
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation:
0
It depends on what kind of script and what you use the timers for.
Posts: 724
Threads: 62
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation:
0
IF you have several 1 seconds timers, it is better to make it into just one and do all the functions in that one.
Posts: 6,129
Threads: 36
Joined: Jan 2009
I was wondering about this a while ago too (by a while ago, I mean sometime last year).
The most efficient way is to use a few X ms timers, the more clogged up with code a function that a timer processes is the slower that a function will process. Hence why it's better to use 1-3 timers. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the best way that I've used/seen.
Posts: 85
Threads: 12
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
0
RetardedWolf is right, It really depends on what script you use.
This forum requires that you wait 120 seconds between posts. Please try again in 1 seconds. -.-
