Posts: 303
Threads: 36
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
0
Hello i'm Nielsbon1,
And i had a question about the town SF.
I am starting a roleplay gamemode and i saw that everything is los santos.
But i dont like los santos so muchs i love SF because it's smaller then los santos.
So it dont get a ghost town.
Who thinks that sf is a good town for RP?
Posts: 562
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2009
Reputation:
0
i definatelly prefer LS ..but SF is good for rp too..
Posts: 6,340
Threads: 58
Joined: May 2009
Reputation:
0
Well, it depends. Los Santos is overused yes, but San Fierro is a bit boring in my opinion. You can try Las Venturas + Desert.
Posts: 4,510
Threads: 163
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation:
0
Depends on the Roleplay.:P If it's about farmers and shit, DESERT + LV.
But i still prefer LS as a RP city, but i definitely hate roleplay xD
I think you should use all the little towns/villages in the desert + LV, atleast they're not overused..
SF = Boring
Posts: 6,129
Threads: 36
Joined: Jan 2009
Unless you expand upon the SF map, it'll be boring. SF is a great place, but it lacks the kind of places that are required for gangs and whatnot. There's a limited amount of gangs that can really be placed within SF, as there's hardly any deprived looking neighborhoods.
EDIT: Sorry for double post, I'm lagging