[Fernado Samuel]

Removed

[LarzI]

How do you declare and assign pName?

[Fernado Samuel]

Removed

[LarzI]

I suspect the PropOwner declaration is faulty.
In the enum you use with PropInfo, add [24] after PropOwner - if you haven't already.

[Jefff]

pawn Код:

strcat( ( PropInfo[ID][PropOwner][0]='\0', PropInfo[ID][PropOwner] ), pName, sizeof(pName));

or

pawn Код:

GetPlayerName(playerid,PropInfo[ID][PropOwner],MAX_PLAYER_NAME);

EDIT:
Ups fail ;d do what LarzI say

[maramizo]

Quote:

Originally Posted by LarzI I suspect the PropOwner declaration is faulty. In the enum you use with PropInfo, add [24] after PropOwner - if you haven't already.

Add [MAX_PLAYER_NAME] instead of [24] after PropOwner, as OP might have #undef and #define'd it to something else, or the script he's working on has. Just as a precaution and a dynamic scripting measure.

[LarzI]

Quote:

Originally Posted by maramizo Add [MAX_PLAYER_NAME] instead of [24] after PropOwner, as OP might have #undef and #define'd it to something else, or the script he's working on has. Just as a precaution and a dynamic scripting measure.

MAX_PLAYER_NAME is defined as a macro to 24 - and 24 is the longest a player name can be. There's no difference if he uses MAX_PLAYER_NAME or 24 UNLESS he did, as you said, #undef and re-define it to something else - something I find highly unlikely.

[maramizo]

Quote:

Originally Posted by LarzI MAX_PLAYER_NAME is defined as a macro to 24 - and 24 is the longest a player name can be. There's no difference if he uses MAX_PLAYER_NAME or 24 UNLESS he did, as you said, #undef and re-define it to something else - something I find highly unlikely.

I'm not arguing about what's best, it's an obvious fact.
He can undefine it then define to 15, then we have 9 wasted character spots, why? It's best if it's dynamic, correct?

[LarzI]

Quote:

Originally Posted by maramizo I'm not arguing about what's best, it's an obvious fact. He can undefine it then define to 15, then we have 9 wasted character spots, why? It's best if it's dynamic, correct?

Yes of course, but unless he never intends to re-define the macro, he would waste time typing in MAX_PLAYER_NAME every time (which takes ~4 seconds) instead of doing just 24 (which takes ~0.3 second). It's all about time efficiency!

[Fernado Samuel]

Thank you guys