[RCON1]

mHooks - Esay hooking callback and public functions!


mHooks simple system hooks do not have to use a dozen lines of code to do the Hook of one LINIK now!

How does it look? very simple

Код:

public OnFilterScriptInit()
{
	printf("OnFilterScriptInit");
	return 1;
}
 
HOOK:test.OnFilterScriptInit()
{
	printf("test hook OnFilterScriptInit");
	return 1;
}

I already have the OnFilterScriptInit Hook

Код:

 needless
public OnFilterScriptInit()

You wonder why hooks with * are HOOKS_CallHook in inc? so it would be easier for me when you update the plugin but I would have to update the plugin every edition - and so is every man for himself can add new callbacks, edit the parameters.

There is one thing we can easily add your own hooks public functions here's a small example:

Код:

forward OnPlayerLogin(playerid, bool:success);
public OnPlayerLogin(playerid, bool:success)  HOOKS_CallHook("OnPlayerLogin", H_INT, playerid, H_BOOL, success);
#if defined _ALS_OnPlayerLogin
	#undef OnPlayerLogin
#else
	#define _ALS_OnPlayerLogin
#endif
#define OnPlayerLogin @@HOnPlayerLogin
forward @@HOnPlayerLogin(playerid);

Now we can use

Код:

public OnPlayerLogin(playerid, bool:success)
{

return 1;
}


HOOK:CHouses.OnPlayerLogin(playerid, bool:success)
{
return 1;
}

Source:https://github.com/piatus/samp-hooks
Release:https://github.com/piatus/samp-hooks/releases

Sorry for my English.

[kadaradam]

Awesome, but how fast is this?
I just want to change y_hooks 4.0, because it sometimes causes pawno crash for me.

[RCON1]

kadaradam, it seems to be a quick but thorough tests makings of tomorrow.

I noticed a problem with the strings, tomorrow is improved.

[nGen.SoNNy]

I'll give it a try

[Abagail]

This doesn't really seem that scripter-friendly, especially for it being a plug-in. Whats the advantage of using this, instead of say y_hooks?

[zT KiNgKoNg]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abagail This doesn't really seem that scripter-friendly, especially for it being a plug-in. Whats the advantage of using this, instead of say y_hooks?

Along with what Abagail said, it's also pretty useless compared to y_hooks mainly because in my eyes it isn't "Scripter-Friendly", but if you improve on it..... Then it might be better.

[RCON1]

New release:
Fixed to crash during the dialog response.
Fixed a crash related to the empty string.
Added HOOKS_GetVersion and optimize code.

https://github.com/piatus/samp-hooks/releases/tag/1.2.3

Quote:

Originally Posted by zT KiNgKoNg Along with what Abagail said, it's also pretty useless compared to y_hooks mainly because in my eyes it isn't "Scripter-Friendly", but if you improve on it..... Then it might be better.

In y_hooks for example, not hooking up your own callbacks / public functions.
mhooks can be nicely used, for example timers with hooks.

Код:

#define htask:%0[%1](%2) %0HOnScrInit(); public %0HOnScrInit() return SetTimer(#%0,%1,true); %0();public %0() return @HOOKS_CallHook(#%0); zdH%0(); public zdH%0()

Use on

Код:

HOOK:CTest.OnlyTesting()
{
	printf("OnlyTesting class CTest hooked");
	return 1;
}
htask:OnlyTesting[1000]() 
{
	printf("OnlyTesting called");
	return 1;
}

The possibilities are many more.

[Abagail]

Thats not nice at all. You have to define something, whereas y_hooks takes care of everything. All you have to do is replace the word "public" with "hook". And, also, YSI 4.0 supports custom callback hooking, so I guess then this plug-in is useless?

Plus, this is a plug-in whereas y_hooks is a simple, (basically) plug-in and play include.

[Crayder]

Quote:

Originally Posted by kadaradam Awesome, but how fast is this? I just want to change y_hooks 4.0, because it sometimes causes pawno crash for me.

No, you cause the pawno crash.

I was about to mention that then I saw your post while doing a quick-reply :P