[qmnty]

Where is better way to do this?

Column like this?

Code 1:

pawn Code:

mysql_get_field("vModel", szFile);
                sscanf(szFile, "p<|>ddd", vehicleInfo[extraid][0][vModel], vehicleInfo[extraid][1][vModel], vehicleInfo[extraid][2][vModel]);

Or

this?

Code 2:

pawn Code:

mysql_get_field("vModel1", szFile);
                vehicleInfo[extraid][0][vModel] = strval(szFile);

                mysql_get_field("vModel2", szFile);
                vehicleInfo[extraid][1][vModel] = strval(szFile);

                mysql_get_field("vModel3", szFile);
                vehicleInfo[extraid][2][vModel] = strval(szFile);

but is that make load the data in code 2 is much longer than code 1?

Thanks...

[mirou123]

The first one is better IMHO for the simple reasons that it's shorter and you won't need to create a shitload of columns in your DB

[Vince]

Neither. You update your plugin and use cache_get_row_int.

[mirou123]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince Neither. You update your plugin and use cache_get_row_int.

Actually if he updates his plugin it would be better to do something like the first code, using cahce_ger_row. and then using sscanf for the reasons I mentioned in my first post.