[2KY]

pawn Код:

CMD:usercp ( playerid, params[] )
{
    new count = GetTickCount();
    
    switch ( CPActive [ playerid ] )
    {
        case 0:
        {
            // It's not active - enable it.
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_Title );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_TopLine );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ChangePW );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ChangeUsername );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_Resync );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ViewMap );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ViewAccInfo );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_BottomLine );
            
            SelectTextDraw ( playerid, 0x7EBA1EFF );
            CPActive [ playerid ] = 1;
            
            SendClientMessage ( playerid, -1, ""#INT_CONSOLE"~ "#INT_SILVER"Type "#INT_YELLOW"/usercp "#INT_SILVER"again to disable the User Control Panel!" );
        }
        
        case 1:
        {
            // It's active - disable it.
            TextDrawHideForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_Title );
            TextDrawHideForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_TopLine );
            TextDrawHideForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ChangePW );
            TextDrawHideForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ChangeUsername );
            TextDrawHideForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_Resync );
            TextDrawHideForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ViewMap );
            TextDrawHideForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ViewAccInfo );
            TextDrawHideForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_BottomLine );
            
            CancelSelectTextDraw ( playerid );
            CPActive [ playerid ] = 0;
            
            SendClientMessage ( playerid, -1, ""#INT_CONSOLE"~ "#INT_SILVER"Type "#INT_YELLOW"/usercp "#INT_SILVER"again to enable the User Control Panel!" );
        }
    }
    
    printf("Time taken to execute /usercp: %d", GetTickCount() - count);
    return true;
}

Does anyone see anything wrong with this? I'm messing around with GetTickCount just to figure out how it works, and the result is always 0.

[Da_Noob]

I don't know much about GetTickCount(), but as you do:

pawn Код:

GetTickCount() - count

Won't it be the same as:

pawn Код:

GetTickCount() - GetTickCount()

So won't it just always display 0?

(It could be that I'm wrong, never worked with GetTickCount)

[2KY]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Da_Noob I don't know much about GetTickCount(), but as you do: pawn Код: GetTickCount() - count Won't it be the same as: pawn Код: GetTickCount() - GetTickCount() So won't it just always display 0? (It could be that I'm wrong, never worked with GetTickCount)

Assuming the time is different, it shouldn't.

[Babul]

11 commands in a switch, needing 0 ms to execute, seems legit. any value >0 would make me think you underclocked your pc ^^

oh, try 1000 or more iterations. and divide the returned value by that amount. it will be *really* close to 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000000

Код:

for(new i=0;i<10000;i++){
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_Title );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_TopLine );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ChangePW );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ChangeUsername );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_Resync );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ViewMap );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_ViewAccInfo );
            TextDrawShowForPlayer ( playerid, UserCP_BottomLine );
}

ok, srsly: copy all the command code into a callback, let it get called from within the command then, and dont forget to use the performance profiler, it will give you accurate results: estimating short routines in milliseconds is not precise enough - your code is too fast for the "low" 0.001 sec timers' resolution. it needs 0.000001 precision.