Posts: 9
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
0
I don't know YCMD or ZCMD+sscanf" fastest
Sorry for my bad english - I use ****** Translate
CMDX
Posts: 289
Threads: 8
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation:
0
I think by looking at the YCMD post that it's the fastest command processor available. It also has some nice features.
Posts: 9
Threads: 3
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
0
Thank you On_Top_Non_Stop I will try.
Posts: 167
Threads: 7
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation:
0
Im using ZCMD because it's better for me. I checked that YCMD, but I don't see point changing my command processor.
Posts: 2,862
Threads: 11
Joined: Mar 2008
Reputation:
0
YCMD is faster if you have large number of commands. Check its topic for test results.
Posts: 654
Threads: 20
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation:
0
ZCMD is much faster, smaller, lightweight, efficient and straight to the point.
YCMD is efficient too, but it has a lot more features and some advanced functions. It's not as fast though. It depends what you want.
Posts: 2,726
Threads: 85
Joined: Jul 2010
Reputation:
0
YCMD is faster, and better. But I still go with ZCMD + SSCANF, because I just don't like to change my whole scripts, for a command processor update.
Posts: 613
Threads: 11
Joined: Aug 2010
Reputation:
0
Y_less himself told that zcmd is still faster than ycmd, but ycmd has alot of advanced and usefull features.