[FilterScript] [FS] Anticheat v.0.1
#1

Has appeared a lot of poor-quality anticheats, especially it is fraught for SA-MP. Today me named the fool, that I criticised for that noob-script which has made frank nonsense("anti air break")
In a month this scratch will be the best anticheat.

Author: Psycho / Faus / Woozie
Length: 50
Last Release: 0.1

v.0.1:
- Antiairbreak (Foot and Vehicle)

Notes:
When you teleport, for correct work you need change iUsedSomething[playerid].
This script don't work correctly with Bomber Filterscript. I don't know why.
If you found any bugs in work, speak to me. I tested it 1,5 hours - no mistakes.
Thanks for tests: BadVlad

Coming soon: New anticheat features and detections methods.

Download
Reply
#2

So apparently this is a anti-cheat for airbreaking?, Well ill love to check it out and see how you pulled that off .
Reply
#3

Quote:

So apparently this is a anti-cheat for airbreaking?

No. You can see in my signature other protection systems. They work only in certain conditions
Reply
#4

Inefficient. It also failed, it had a false positive.
Reply
#5

it's only your stupid opinion.. hater
Reply
#6

^Faus, its fail BIG fail
Reply
#7

Me, Dцrfler, Karlip and Lu-Mi are testing it RIGHT now, and we've had 16 bans between us, for example, jumping off a bike.
Reply
#8

Quote:
Originally Posted by ^Faus
it's only your stupid opinion.. hater
You fail, westie has a point: airbrake detection is NEVER 100% precise, it will always catch a dozen of false positive cases, i talk this from my experiences in writing anti-airbreak.
Reply
#9

xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Replace Detectiong Speed on GetPlayerPing(playerid)
If you have big ping, it's will working bad. In my ping(10) it's working perfectly.
Reply
#10

Quote:
Originally Posted by ^Faus
it's only your stupid opinion.. hater
Humph, look who's talking about hating. Obviously, your stupidity, and trolling came to a outcome that you failed at the anti-cheat, and wounded up getting schooled by Westie & RedShirt (JernejL). Saying stupid things about other user's code isn't very nice, and doesn't make you look cool, like you know it all. Maybe next time, you should try shutting up.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)