[Yashas]

It does better performance wise but the improvement is completely useless.

The total commands which are executed, at the rate of 10 commands per second (this is an exaggeration) will be 864000 commands, less than a million.

How much CPU time do you save in the whole day? 0ms... it is so small that it is not measurable.

[JJohnson1]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yashas It does better performance wise but the improvement is completely useless.

You wouldn't think that something that "does better performance wise" could also be called "completely useless." In the same sentence no less..lol..I think it's always a good thing when you have a few opinions about something like this, it's always good to get a couple of different views when deciding whether to use something or not.I think [imo] this has some definite good qualities and am sure the "speed" thing is probably negligible but I'm also sure it will most likely depend on the particular users unique application ideas. Anyways nice work SickAttack I will definitely be giving this a look see.>>>Thanks for Your Work. <+Rep'd>

[BrianFaria]

Nice!!

[BigETI]

This library is so fast, that it crashes on faulty strings passed to CallLocalFunction.

[J0sh...]

mashallah proper lads do not check