Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? - WackoX - 08.01.2009
Hello, click on the member list above the forum, then sort on Date Registered, you will see ''Mike'' will come up first, registeren on 1969-12-31, then samp registered on 2005-03-31, then kye registered on 2005-04-03
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Antironix - 08.01.2009
It is the lowest value of date you can have in this forum.
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
f3llah1n - 08.01.2009
Mike (used to at least) set up and run the forums, which were then hosted on littlewhitey's servers (which he also helped run).
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
f3llah1n - 08.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssǝן‾ʎ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wadabak
It is the lowest value of date you can have in this forum.
|

|
Never noticed the specific date. Nicely done.
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Antironix - 08.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssǝן‾ʎ
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wadabak
It is the lowest value of date you can have in this forum.
|

|
I never (still..) don't know why. Is it just because the developers scripted it like that or has it something to do with the PC time or something?
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
luxeon - 08.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wadabak
Is it just because the developers scripted it like that or has it something to do with the PC time or something?
|
+1, interested in this.
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Antironix - 08.01.2009
NVM, /me is dumb.
It is where unix started
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
kc - 08.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westie
Some computers (or programs, look at C++ and unsigned integers (I believe, correct me if I'm wrong)) cannot handle negative values, so sometimes they can crash.
|
which is why Y2K happened (basically)
Alot of programs used just 2 digits for the year, and add 1900 to that, or even just add 19 infront of it, causing the year to appear to be 1900 on those programs, causing some to crash.
The next one of these errors happens in 2038. Which will cause all systems that use 32 bit integers to store the date. Which will turn negative on exactly "03:14:07 UTC on Tuesday, 19 January 2038"
Then another one is year 65,536.
I'm sure you have all seen the ping "65535", or that number as a players ammo when they don't have any guns? Well 65,535 is the largest number that can be represented by a 16 bit binary number. So the year 65536 is going to cause another negative problem with 16 bit systems.
There is actually loads of these, listed on wikipedia at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_fo...d_storage_bugs
The best one, is the year 170,141,183,460,469,231,731,687,303,715,884,105,72 7. this is the year that 128-bit Unix time would reset to zero.
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Joe Staff - 08.01.2009
good thing computers run on 64-bit procs now >.> or will by 2038
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Tez2k7 - 08.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westie
Some computers (or programs, look at C++ and unsigned integers (I believe, correct me if I'm wrong)) cannot handle negative values, so sometimes they can crash.
EDIT: I'm now e-leet!

|
How the fuck?
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
lavamike - 08.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by [XG
Tez ]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Westie
Some computers (or programs, look at C++ and unsigned integers (I believe, correct me if I'm wrong)) cannot handle negative values, so sometimes they can crash.
EDIT: I'm now e-leet!

|
How the fuck?
|
lol, wtf?
Name: Westie
Posts: leet (1.819 per day)
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Hypo - 09.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by lavamike
lol, wtf?
Name: Westie
Posts: leet (1.819 per day)
|
He has reached 1337 posts, and that in the brackets is percentage or something how many times he has posted in one day..Someone correct me if im wrong..
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Rozzie - 09.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssǝן‾ʎ
No, that's exactly right, leet is a special rank you get only for 1337 posts exactly.
|
yep, i alreally had it
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Popz - 09.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssǝן‾ʎ
No, that's exactly right, leet is a special rank you get only for 1337 posts exactly.
|
it means you should stop spamming and go outside
* Popz runs away from ssǝן‾ʎ
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
ThePro - 09.01.2009
The 1337 post thing is an smf eastern egg (
http://www.simplemachines.org/commun...709#msg1536709)
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Antironix - 09.01.2009
http://forum.sa-mp.com/index.php?action=about:unknown
http://forum.sa-mp.com/index.php?=PH...9-00AA001ACF42
http://forum.sa-mp.com/index.php?action=about:mozilla
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
KingJ - 09.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wadabak
|
about
:unknown and about
:mozilla are not SMF easter eggs, they are mozilla ones. For a bit of fun, try about
:config
PHPE9568F36-D428-11d2-A769-00AA001ACF42 is a PHP easter egg, again not SMF
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
Antironix - 09.01.2009
Yeah, I know it was from php, but people don't know it

Except you xD
There is a leet one and 'I am a Geek!' one. Also there is a easter eggs in the registration page.
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
HB - 09.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingJ
For a bit of fun, try about:config
|
Rofl :P
You must have been bored to found out about the user registered at 1969... :P
Re: Forum date registered bug? someone registered in the year 1969? -
KingJ - 09.01.2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssǝן‾ʎ
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingJ
For a bit of fun, try about:config
|
Why is that a bit of fun? That's just the advanced settings page...
|
Because some of the settings can be amusing. Tab size for example. You can change almost anything in there, compared to the standard options.