A question again about defining..

A question again about defining.. - Printable Version

+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: A question again about defining.. (/showthread.php?tid=589850)

A question again about defining.. - swiftyrus - 23.09.2015

So, in the old thread I understood about defining player vars with dot (e.g. Player.Name instead of Player[playerid][Name]). A new question is about defining functions...
For example, we have a standard function, standard callback and one custom function:

Код:

public OnPlayerConnect(playerid)
{
 SendClientMessage(playerid, -1, "Hello!"); //it will be our standard function
}

SetPlayerSomeStuff(playerid) //custom function
{
 SomeFunc();
 SomeFuncElse();
}

I want to write it like (in some place I've also define 'event' (public) and 'player' (playerid)):

Код:

event player.connect()
{
 player.sendMessage(-1, "Hello!");
}

player.setSomeStuff()
{
 SomeFunc();
 SomeFuncElse();
}

It will be good if someone explain me how to make define like that. I mean.. em.. something like that:

Код:

#define %0.connect() OnPlayerConnect(%0)

Thanks.

Re: A question again about defining.. - Vince - 23.09.2015

Pawn is not an OO language and I don't think it's wise to pretend that it is. You're only making things more difficult for yourself and others reading your code.

Re: A question again about defining.. - swiftyrus - 23.09.2015

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vince

Pawn is not an OO language and I don't think it's wise to pretend that it is. You're only making things more difficult for yourself and others reading your code.

I know, but I want to try. I have no plans to release my code to the public.

I have a strict source code structure and I will not have the problems with reading my code.

Re: A question again about defining.. - rappy93 - 23.09.2015

What do you want to try exactly since PAWN is not object oriented? Its like saying you know that your car is limited to 50km/h and yet you want it to go 100km/h. Not sure if the best example but this is what I came up with on the spot xD.

Re: A question again about defining.. - swiftyrus - 23.09.2015

Quote:

Originally Posted by rappy93

What do you want to try exactly since PAWN is not object oriented?

I want to.. imitate classes, I guess, nothing more. I described this in the examples.

Re: A question again about defining.. - MP2 - 23.09.2015

Quote:

Originally Posted by rappy93

What do you want to try exactly since PAWN is not object oriented? Its like saying you know that your car is limited to 50km/h and yet you want it to go 100km/h. Not sure if the best example but this is what I came up with on the spot xD.

More accurately, it's like a car that goes 50km/h and you paint 100km/h on the speedo and pretend you're going faster. It's stupid and pointless.

AW: A question again about defining.. - Kaliber - 23.09.2015

It's not perfect...but you can do it like that:

PHP код:



#define event public

#define connect() OnPlayerConnect(playerid)

#define player.sendMessage(%0) SendClientMessage(playerid,%0)

#define func stock


event connect()

{

     player.sendMessage(-1, "Hello!");

}


func setSomeStuff()

{

    return 1;

}

Re: AW: A question again about defining.. - swiftyrus - 24.09.2015

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaliber

It's not perfect...but you can do it like that:

PHP код:



#define event public

#define connect() OnPlayerConnect(playerid)

#define player.sendMessage(%0) SendClientMessage(playerid,%0)

#define func stock


event connect()

{

     player.sendMessage(-1, "Hello!");

}


func setSomeStuff()

{

    return 1;

}

Yeah, you understood me, thank you, I will be modify this for myself.