Policy about giving warnings - Printable Version

Policy about giving warnings - Printable Version

+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: General (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Thread: Policy about giving warnings (/showthread.php?tid=533408)

Policy about giving warnings - CoaPsyFactor - 24.08.2014

Hi everyone,

I simply needed to create this thread, as I got warning for some "adfly" link I've posted 2 years ago. So I just want to hear your opinion on this

Here you can see when I was warned...

And here, when that link was posted...

Way to go administration team... way to go

Re: Policy about giving warnings - FlawPaw - 24.08.2014

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Re: Policy about giving warnings - Infinity - 24.08.2014

As can be read in the rules, posting pay-per-click links is not allowed. So yes, you deserve the warning. What's the point of the topic again, and why is this a matter that should be posted in the "General" subforum, when this is clearly not something that applies to the entirety of SA-MP?

Re: Policy about giving warnings - PrivatioBoni - 24.08.2014

Stupid things you do in the past often catch up to you and bite you in the ass.

Re: Policy about giving warnings - DiGiTaL_AnGeL - 24.08.2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infinity

As can be read in the rules, posting pay-per-click links is not allowed. So yes, you deserve the warning. What's the point of the topic again, and why is this a matter that should be posted in the "General" subforum, when this is clearly not something that applies to the entirety of SA-MP?

Cessil warned him 2 years after the post. That's why.

Re: Policy about giving warnings - CoaPsyFactor - 24.08.2014

You people are acting like you are getting something from this, yes I know I've posted pay-per-click link (but it was just copied from yt that was in given thread), but really, it has been two years. And I think this should be in general, because this prove how "updated" is administration team.... two years..... this can be locked now

Re: Policy about giving warnings - Infinity - 24.08.2014

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoaPsyFactor

You people are acting like you are getting something from this, yes I know I've posted pay-per-click link (but it was just copied from yt that was in given thread), but really, it has been two years. And I think this should be in general, because this prove how "updated" is administration team.... two years..... this can be locked now

Unlike how the real-world-laws often work, rulebreaks here do not expire. It's not as if you can't get punished after a certain period of time. Your post probably never really stood out, untill someone happened to come across it. (Either a moderator, or a normal user who reported it)

I see nothing wrong here...

Re: Policy about giving warnings - Khanz - 24.08.2014

WOW, who the fuck cares. Don't break rules next time.

Re: Policy about giving warnings - Precious - 24.08.2014

Blaming the "administration" for your own mistake is pretty hypocritical, no?

Re: Policy about giving warnings - CoaPsyFactor - 24.08.2014

Khanz, with word fu*k you broke the rule

Precious: I'm not blaming admin team for my mistake, I'm blaming them for their mistake