SHA512 or Whirlpool - Printable Version
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: SHA512 or Whirlpool (/showthread.php?tid=518097)
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: SHA512 or Whirlpool (/showthread.php?tid=518097)
SHA512 or Whirlpool - Mauricee - 08.06.2014
What do you choose and why
?
Re: SHA512 or Whirlpool - Faisal_khan - 08.06.2014
Whirlpool:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ******
 Very simple plugin. Just provides an implementation of the whirlpool hash algorithm for PAWN. This is so that you don't need to use bad hash systems like MD5, plain awful ones like Adler32 (UDB_Hash) or ones that aren't even true hashes (encode).
Unlike most other hash functions (MD5 and SHA1 included) there are no known weaknesses in whirlpool, so you can be sure your hashes are secure. |
Re: SHA512 or Whirlpool - Yousha - 15.01.2016
Sorry for exhumation, but:
I haven't seen any evidence that one is a clear winner in terms of security or performance, both are awesome. But Whirlpool is very uncommon...
So I would suggest y'a to use SHA512, which is Very common and made by NSA!
: https://sampforum.blast.hk/showthread.php?tid=188734