ternary operator -
SnL - 18.02.2014
pawn Code:
(var) ? (SendClientMessage(playerid,-1,"test 1")) : (SendClientMessage(playerid,-1,"test 2"))
I tried to learn about it but it game me error i'm missing
Re: ternary operator - Patrick - 18.02.2014
In ternary operator it looks like this.
pawn Code:
SendClientMessage(playerid, -1, ( var == 1 ) ? ("Test 1") : ("Test 2") );
//function -^ args^ if-^ then-^ ^-else
In else if it looks like this.
pawn Code:
if( var == 1) SendClientMessage(playerid, -1, "Test 1");
else SendClientMessage(playerid, -1, "Test 2");
Why do you want to use Ternary Operator? Why not use else if instead? it looks better and easier to read imo.
Re: ternary operator -
SnL - 18.02.2014
Thank you +rep now i can understand.
What do you mean by 4-char?
Re: ternary operator - Patrick - 18.02.2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnL
Thank you +rep now i can understand.
What do you mean by 4-char?
|
4 Character, I had nothing to comment so I added 4-char to post my comment, although I edited my post and you should read it again.
Re: ternary operator -
SnL - 18.02.2014
lmao ok

Because ternary operator is more faster than if-else if ( i readed it )
Re: ternary operator -
GWMPT - 18.02.2014
Ternary operator processing speed is the same as the if / else statement.
if not mistaken
Re: ternary operator -
SnL - 18.02.2014
and why exists? if is the same as if ?
i read in a spanish tutorial that ternary operators works more fast than ifs
Re: ternary operator -
GWMPT - 18.02.2014
Ternary operators exists to reduce the lines of code, and make the if statement somehow, more "flexible"[I can't describe it in a better word]
For example, you want to add "1" to the variable "randomvar" if the variable "tfalse" is true, or add "5" if the variable "tfalse" is false.
In the traditional programming, you would do this:
pawn Code:
if(tfalse)
randomvar = 1;
else
randomvar = 5;
So, with the ternary operator, you do:
pawn Code:
randomvar = (tfalse) ? 1 : 5;
Smaller, more "flexible", and it simply does what you need.
Re: ternary operator -
SnL - 18.02.2014
Oh okay now i understand.
Thank you +rep.