Operator ':?' <-- - Printable Version

Operator ':?' <-- - Printable Version

+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: Operator ':?' <-- (/showthread.php?tid=447149)

Operator ':?' <-- - sKgaL - 28.06.2013

How do I use operator ':?' ?
Lets say I have this code :

Code:

if(StartRountCount)StartRountCount=false;
else StartRountCount=true;

How can I short it using ':?' ?
Thanks alot :)

Re: Operator ':?' <-- - Djole1337 - 28.06.2013

Dis guy bellow is right.

AW: Operator ':?' <-- - BigETI - 28.06.2013

no need for ? and :

pawn Code:

StartRountCount = !StartRountCount;

is "Rount" even a word, or just a typo?

Re: Operator ':?' <-- - sKgaL - 28.06.2013

I Didnt understand you.

Here is an exaple from operator ':?' :

Code:

format(str, 256, "Auto login [%s]", AutoLogin[playerid] ? ("On") : ("Off"));

Re: Operator ':?' <-- - Jefff - 28.06.2013

pawn Code:

StartRountCount = (StartRountCount) ? false : true;

AW: Operator ':?' <-- - BigETI - 28.06.2013

Do you really want something like

pawn Code:

StartRountCount = StartRountCount ? false : true;

this?

My example above

pawn Code:

StartRountCount = !StartRountCount;

is in my opinion much more efficient.

Re: Operator ':?' <-- - jamesbond007 - 28.06.2013

y u no read wiki..

https://sampwiki.blast.hk/wiki/Control_Structures#.3F:

Re: Operator ':?' <-- - sKgaL - 29.06.2013

Thanks all for your help,
I really appreciate it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y_Less

Better question, why? You clearly have code that works, shortening it will not make it "more efficient" (whatever people think that means) and will just make the code harder to read.

I wanted to expend my pawn skills..

Re: Operator ':?' <-- - sKgaL - 29.06.2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y_Less

In that case read the language guide:

https://sampforum.blast.hk/showthread.php?tid=289258

Looks good,
Thanks Y_Less

AW: Re: Operator ':?' <-- - BigETI - 29.06.2013

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y_Less

Better question, why? You clearly have code that works, shortening it will not make it "more efficient" (whatever people think that means) and will just make the code harder to read.

Have you tested it yet? I had faster results on

pawn Code:

toggle = !toggle;

than on

pawn Code:

toggle = toggle ? false : true;

to be excact:

Code:

[02:45:40]  Starting benchmark test with 3 tests each method with 1000000 loops...
[02:45:40]  Toggler - "ternary operator" the 1.
[02:45:40]  1. result of ternary operator toggling: 99 ms
[02:45:40]  Toggler - "ternary operator" the 2.
[02:45:41]  2. result of ternary operator toggling: 99 ms
[02:45:41]  Toggler - "ternary operator" the 3.
[02:45:41]  3. result of ternary operator toggling: 99 ms
[02:45:41]  Toggler - "equals not" the 1.
[02:45:41]  1. result of equals not toggling: 84 ms
[02:45:41]  Toggler - "equals not" the 2.
[02:45:41]  2. result of equals not toggling: 84 ms
[02:45:41]  Toggler - "equals not" the 3.
[02:45:41]  3. result of equals not toggling: 84 ms
[02:45:41]  Benchmark test finished!