PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! -
XtremeR - 16.09.2012
PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE, i was scripting as soon as i compiled Power Cutter, and when it came back i went to my script and it was empty 1 line with nothing on it PLEASE HELP! i just got the AMX from my Server
Re: PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! - Glint - 16.09.2012
That is because you didn't save your work.
That is bad, i don't think you can recover it.
Re: PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! -
XtremeR - 16.09.2012
i did saved it
i was working on that script for over a month now :/ i got only .amx please help me please please...
Re: PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! -
Deal-or-die - 16.09.2012
Were you using any form of DeAMX?
(This forum requires that you wait 120 seconds between posts. Please try again in 48 seconds.)
Re: PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! -
iggy1 - 16.09.2012
unfortunately if you have no backup, you have lost your file. BETA testers can't help you here.
Even if you de-amx it, you wont get the original source back.
ALWAYS keep backups.
Re: PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! -
XtremeR - 16.09.2012
DeAMX wont gimme the script that i needed.. i wasnt using it..
Re: PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! -
[HK]Ryder[AN] - 16.09.2012
u weren't using it so u can get it back..If u enable deamx code init u cant deamx it.
Re: PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! -
iggy1 - 16.09.2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by [HK]Ryder[AN]
u weren't using it so u can get it back..If u enable deamx code init u cant deamx it.
|
I think your confusing
De-amx for
anti De-amx.
Re: PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! -
Deal-or-die - 16.09.2012
Yes, sorry I for some strange reason think of 'De-amx' as 'Anti De-amx', But yes, I was trying to say was if you have not used a 'Anti De-amx', then you should be able to DeAMX, well as far as I know. I always thought DeAMXing gave back the full source... but possibly not.
Sorry for confusing the scene.
Re: PLEASE HELP ME BETA TESTERS PLEASE! -
iggy1 - 16.09.2012
There may be a new version that gives full source, but last time i used it (2-3 years now) instead of naming callbacks/publics correct, it names them by ID. You also won't get comments back.
EG,
pawn Код:
public function0()
{
}
public function1()
{
}
I'm pretty sure that's what it used to do at least. But i may be wrong now, as it was long ago i used it. So i apologize also if I'm wrong.