IRC: access V.S. xop - Printable Version
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: Other (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Everything and Nothing (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: IRC: access V.S. xop (/showthread.php?tid=366875)
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: Other (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Everything and Nothing (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: IRC: access V.S. xop (/showthread.php?tid=366875)
IRC: access V.S. xop - Kirollos - 08.08.2012
What's the better to use?
Access function?
Or,
xOP function?
Re: IRC: access V.S. xop - CJ101 - 08.08.2012
While the xOP feature is nice, it is limited. with Access, you can add multiple channel owners, such as:
/cs access #channel ADD Name 9999
will add another owner.
Re: IRC: access V.S. xop - [MM]IKKE - 08.08.2012
^true
You can also set autovoice on - by changing the "voice" level to 0.
Another thing is restricting users in what they are able to do: eg You can allow one +o to kick other ops while disallowing the others: set level 5 for normal OPs, set level 6 for this one guy, and then enable opkick at level 6. Using the same method you could also remove certain features for one person after he abuses that - instead of a full demotion.
If you know a lot about IRC, I suggest using access levels. If you're fairly new with it, xOP will likely already be sufficient for your stuff.
Re: IRC: access V.S. xop - linuxthefish - 10.08.2012
Depends on how big your channel is.
Re: IRC: access V.S. xop - Djole1337 - 10.08.2012
I prefer access.