[QUESTION] Is this scripting structure good or bad? - Printable Version

+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+---- Forum: Help Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+---- Thread: [QUESTION] Is this scripting structure good or bad? (/showthread.php?tid=167678)

---

[QUESTION] Is this scripting structure good or bad? - JonyAvati - 13.08.2010

Hi,
I am actually trying some organization methods for my PAWN scripts, I thought it would be a good idea to have, for example, the commands in a "commands" folder, and that each command represents a file, like "help.pwn", then include it in the main gamemode like : #INCLUDE <../commands/help.pwn>.

I'm sure this would slowdown the compilation progress, what do you think?

---

Re: [QUESTION] Is this scripting structure good or bad? - Hiddos - 13.08.2010

I'd simply place it in the pawno/includes folder, it doens't quite matters for the .amx file whether a .inc file exists or not.

---

Re: [QUESTION] Is this scripting structure good or bad? - Calgon - 13.08.2010

That's a bit of a mess and would slow down the compile process.

Maybe you could create an include, or a separate pwn file for important snippets of the script, such as one for commands, instead of having one for every single command. One for other important functions, etc, etc.

---

Re: [QUESTION] Is this scripting structure good or bad? - playbox12 - 13.08.2010

I agree with Calgon, also it would take a long time to understand the script, if you have an problem. You would have to go trough all the Includes.

---