strtok vs sscanf - Printable Version
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+---- Forum: Help Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+---- Thread: strtok vs sscanf (/showthread.php?tid=139000)
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+---- Forum: Help Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=89)
+---- Thread: strtok vs sscanf (/showthread.php?tid=139000)
strtok vs sscanf - MummyKillerSLO - 03.04.2010
Hello!
I wanna ask, what is better: function strtok or sscanf. I want to ask also what is dcmd
. 
Re: strtok vs sscanf - Correlli - 03.04.2010
sscanf of course. It's faster and more efficient, and dcmd is a command processor, but I suggest you to use zcmd, it's faster than dcmd.
Re: strtok vs sscanf - MummyKillerSLO - 03.04.2010
ok thanks for the reply
Re: strtok vs sscanf - MenaceX^ - 03.04.2010
sscanf... like da...
Re: strtok vs sscanf - MummyKillerSLO - 03.04.2010
Ermm... One new question: When I make zcmd command, it writes:
Код:
C:\Users\Computer\Desktop\Server\gamemodes\CrazyStunts.pwn(82) : warning 203: symbol is never used: "heal"
Код:
command(heal,playerid,params[])
{
new User;
if(!sscanf(params,"u",User))
{
SetPlayerHealth(User, 100);
}
else return SendClientMessage(playerid,0x0000FF,"(USAGE): /Heal (Player ID)");
return 1;
}
Re: strtok vs sscanf - playdead - 03.04.2010
under OnPlayerCommandText u gotta do:
Код:
dcmd_heal(params[],playerid);
Re: strtok vs sscanf - MummyKillerSLO - 03.04.2010
It wont work because i am using Zcmd not dcmd
Re: strtok vs sscanf - woot - 03.04.2010
pawn Код:
heal(playerid,params[])
{
new User;
if(!sscanf(params,"u",User))
{
SetPlayerHealth(User, 100);
}
else return SendClientMessage(playerid,0x0000FF,"(USAGE): /Heal (Player ID)");
return 1;
}
Re: strtok vs sscanf - Jay_ - 04.04.2010
Note that strtok isn't that slow. If you prefer it, use it. A lot of people exaggerate theoretical performance without even benchmarking it themselves in the first place.
Re: strtok vs sscanf - [HUN]Gamestar - 04.04.2010
Try this.
pawn Код:
COMMAND:heal(playerid, params[])
{
......
}
pawn Код:
COMMAND:heal(playerid, params[])
{
new giveplayerid;
if(!sscanf(params,"u",giveplayerid)) {
SetPlayerHealth(playerid,100.0);
} else {
if(IsPlayerConnected(giveplayerid)) {
SetPlayerHealth(giveplayerid,100.0);
}
}
return 1;
}
Re: strtok vs sscanf - Rac3r - 04.04.2010
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by _Jay_
Note that strtok isn't that slow. If you prefer it, use it. A lot of people exaggerate theoretical performance without even benchmarking it themselves in the first place.
|
Processing code is super fast, people worrying about a millisecond or two is really silly. We use both, not for any real reason apart from it gets the job done.
Re: strtok vs sscanf - dice7 - 06.04.2010
I actually did some test and found out that sscanf is always faster, but in 'faster' I mean in miliseconds. If a player enters 10 thousand commands at once, sscanf will process them about ~10 miliseconds faster, 100 thousand ~100 milliseconds faster and 1 million commands, sscanf will be about a second faster.
It was tested with a command with only one extra parameter ("/heal 45"), which may made them almost the same speed. But for a player to actually notice the difference, the command would probably have to be something like
"/dosomething [carid] [playerid] [playerid2] [color1] [color2] [color3] [color4] [string1] [string2] [string3] [string4] [something else 1] [something else 2]" and even that would be like half a second in speed.
The final verdict is that use that which is easier for you
Here's the code used for testing
http://pastebin.com/A16tt7CH
Re: strtok vs sscanf - Hiddos - 06.04.2010
Iґm switching over right now.
Re: strtok vs sscanf - aircombat - 06.04.2010
Def. sscanf