adler32 PAWN hash does not match PHP hash

adler32 PAWN hash does not match PHP hash - Printable Version

+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Thread: adler32 PAWN hash does not match PHP hash (/showthread.php?tid=123043)

adler32 PAWN hash does not match PHP hash - Chris. - 24.01.2010

Hey,
I'm currently having some problems with adler32. I'm trying to hash a password in PHP with adler32 then matching the hash with one hashed in my gamemode.

Here is the adler32 function I'm using for PHP:

PHP код:



function Toadler32($buf)
{
  $lenght = strlen($buf);
  $str = str_split($buf);
  $s1 = 1;
  $s2 = 0;
  for($n=0; $n<$lenght; $n++)
  {
   $s1 = ($s1 + $str[$n])% 65521;
   $s2 = ($s2 + $s1)  % 65521;
  }
  return ($s2 << 16) + $s1;
}

This is the adler32 function I'm using in my gamemode:

pawn Код:

adler32(buf[])
{
  new length=strlen(buf);
  new s1 = 1;
  new s2 = 0;
  new n;
  for (n=0; n<length; n++)
  {
    s1 = (s1 + buf[n]) % 65521;
    s2 = (s2 + s1)   % 65521;
  }
  return (s2 << 16) + s1;
}

For example, if I hash "testing" in PAWN, the hash returns as 203293439 but when I hash it in PHP it returns as 458753. I'm not sure why it's doing this, I believe it should be returning the same hash. I've been searching for any solutions but haven't found any. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

Re: adler32 PAWN hash does not match PHP hash - legodude - 21.02.2012

I think str_split has something to do with it.

Re: adler32 PAWN hash does not match PHP hash - iPLEOMAX - 21.02.2012

Use this include: https://sampforum.blast.hk/showthread.php?tid=319574

Re: adler32 PAWN hash does not match PHP hash - iTorran - 21.02.2012

People should really start checking topic dates, hehe.

Re: adler32 PAWN hash does not match PHP hash - jamesbond007 - 21.02.2012

Quote:

Originally Posted by ******

Yes they should. I don't even understand how you can accidentally find a topic two years old - surely that would be on page 2000+?

search engines?