****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Printable Version
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: Other (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Everything and Nothing (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** (/showthread.php?tid=267475)
+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: Other (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Everything and Nothing (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+--- Thread: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** (/showthread.php?tid=267475)
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Hal - 09.07.2011
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Calg00ne
 The only slightly negative thing ****** have done to ******* was introduce Vevo.
|
And with the layout changes... in two months people will not be able to say what they really did change cause they just forget and get used to it.
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Mark_Weston - 09.07.2011
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mrkrabz
Yes and hope to hell ****** takes over ********, I hate ********, as they don't even listen to the user's of the site. Unlike ****** who actually take suggestions, and are pretty much BIGGER than ********, and would be more reliable to own something like this.
|
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - iFriSki - 09.07.2011
Mark, ****** is already bigger than ******** and they listen.
Regardless, ****** + is ugly, slow, unresponsive, and lacks features compared to ********.
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - SaW - 09.07.2011
I'll just stick with ********, ******+ is only an option if ******** shuts down and my friends move to ******+.
Which I highly doubt as there are tons of finnish social networking sites neither do I see ******** shutting down.
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - linuxthefish - 09.07.2011
Thanks for invites Calg00ne and whoever else invited me
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Diagram - 09.07.2011
Was lucky enough someone sent me an invite.
... and then pops out a sentence "You must be over a certain age to use this feature". Meh.
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - DirtyLilFreak - 09.07.2011
well ******** haven't stop developing yet. I was watching Mark Zuckerburg's meeting on July 6th and they joined with skype and soon they will release a video call system with the ******** chat, also a group chat option. I dont think ****** can catch up with ******** (well maybe in three to four years probably, well only if they can find the next big thing). Anyway ******+ has a nice interface.
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Burridge - 09.07.2011
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by iFriSki
Regardless, ****** + is ugly, slow, unresponsive, and lacks features compared to ********.
|
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Joe Staff - 09.07.2011
******+ already has video chat and you can do it with multiple people
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Haydn - 10.07.2011
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by iFriSki
Use to be. About January I was able to get 3g at my house, and it even sucks.
Browser performance related. Or just what's in the case. |
Both were close to new. Same connection.
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Burridge - 10.07.2011
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steven82
Slow? Unresponsive? Ugly? Doesn't work?
None of that make sense. |
Sarcasm aside. That post was written from MY experience over the 3(?) years I have used FB. Those sentiments are also that of the majority of my Friends list. I have introduced many of my Friends to ******+. They instantly fell in love with it. It's got a crisp, clean layout (plain admittedly, I'll give you plain). We also like the fact it has no advertisements. Now, don't get me wrong, advertisements are a good thing in most cases, they bring revenue. However, when I'm browsing a social networking site, I don't really want to see some of the ads that do get placed there. (I've seen ads for Viagra before ffs >_>, and ads for those gaming girl websites or some shit like that). My point is, that as far as I'm concerned, and as far as the majority of my Friends are concerned, ******+ is just so much better.
The most annoying feature of ******** at the moment, is that damned chat...the amount of times it bugs out on me, and many other people is amazing...
Anyway, I have no more to say in regards to which is better. For me it's ******+, hands down.
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - LilNab - 10.07.2011
******+ is much better then ********.
It's fast and very nice layout
The only thing i dont like is that there is no chat.
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Burridge - 10.07.2011
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LilNab
******+ is much better then ********.
It's fast and very nice layout The only thing i dont like is that there is no chat. |
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Patrik356b - 10.07.2011
What's the point of getting ******** when i already have ******+ ?
******+ looks better and is more convenient i think
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Calgon - 10.07.2011
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Patrik356b
What's the point of getting ******** when i already have ******+ ?
******+ looks better and is more convenient i think |
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Hal - 11.07.2011
The invites are open again!
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - Saurik - 11.07.2011
FB FTW !
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - cybertank378 - 12.07.2011
if u wanna to get invite i can invite u just PM Me your ****** account i will Invite u...
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - maziar_gamer - 12.07.2011
****** is bad !!!! i love ********
Re: ****** Plus. ****** vs. ******** - MPKaboose - 12.07.2011
I wont mind trying ******+, ******** has loads of issues with security (talking about those harmful spam things)