[Tutorial] GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ?

[Tutorial] GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - Printable Version

+- SA-MP Forums Archive (https://sampforum.blast.hk)
+-- Forum: SA-MP Scripting and Plugins (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: Scripting Help (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+---- Forum: Tutorials (https://sampforum.blast.hk/forumdisplay.php?fid=70)
+---- Thread: [Tutorial] GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? (/showthread.php?tid=180159)

Pages: 1 2

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - LarzI - 01.10.2010

It's not a bad attitude to bring up facts.
On the other hand; telling a person to 'stfu' is pretty rude, so I would watch my attitude myself if I were you.

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - Calgon - 01.10.2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claude

Uhm.. Stfu okay? Don't wanna get banned again? Work on your attitude

[FeK]DraKiNs @ Thanks for your explaination

Calm down and read the posts above in the future instead of making yourself look like a fool. Work on your intelligence AND your attitude, your comment was rather rude.

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - Claude - 02.10.2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Calgon

Calm down and read the posts above in the future instead of making yourself look like a fool. Work on your intelligence AND your attitude, your comment was rather rude.

Oh, sir, I am very calm, you too? Yet your comment was either rude.
/discussionclosed

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - The_Moddler - 03.10.2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y_Less

Actually foreach uses a completely different method - it maintains an internal linked list of connected players, so it only ever loops through connected players.

Oh, I knew that it wasn't using MAX_PLAYERS

Thanks

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - Calgon - 03.10.2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claude

Oh, sir, I am very calm, you too? Yet your comment was either rude.
/discussionclosed

I am calm.

Quote:

Originally Posted by thomas..

roflpawned

Are you honestly that retarded?

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - LarzI - 03.10.2010

Claude, you fail.
thomas.. you fail even more, so just quit it.

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - ZecKo - 03.10.2010

Code:

new Money[GetMaxPlayers()];

We can't define the numer of array slots with a function (or variable), the code above crashes pawncc.

Delete this tutorial ?

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - Mike_Peterson - 03.10.2010

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZecKo

Code:

new Money[GetMaxPlayers()];

We can't define the numer of array slots with a function (or variable), the code above crashes pawncc.

Delete this tutorial ?

hmm... and what if you do:

new Max_Playa = GetMaxPlayers()

new Money[Max_Playa];

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - ZecKo - 03.10.2010

It will be the same, think, GetMaxPlayers() is not knew at the compilation, only after, it just can't works.

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - MrDeath537 - 06.01.2011

Quote:

Originally Posted by ******

[HLF]Southclaw: The one issue with using a non-standard define is:

pawn Код:

#include <a_samp>
#define PLAYERS 10
#include <other_inc>

Here the other include will still use the default 500 players, despite your attempts to prevent that waste of memory, the best option would possibly be both (except when you are writing code to be released, in which case I would definitely encourage using MAX_PLAYERS).

OMG, I never through about the other includes still using 500 cells!

Quote:

Originally Posted by [FeK]DraKiNs

pawn Код:

#Define LoopPlayers (%0,%1) for(new 0%=0,%0 <%1,%0++) if(IsPlayerConnected (%0) && !IsPlayerNPC (%0))

Your macro is bad, right one:

pawn Код:

#define LoopPlayers(%0,%1) for(new %0; %0 < %1; %0++) if(IsPlayerConnected(%0) && !IsPlayerNPC(%0))

Re: GetMaxPlayers() > MAX_PLAYERS ? - aco_SRBIJA - 22.03.2012

My compiler crashes.